| Home | TMF: Stats & Records | TM2: Stats & Records | Forum | Login |
Dedimania forum
Feel free to express yourself on your favorite dedicated related tool.
You are not logged in.
#1 2019-08-25 22:48:49
- ?? :?aradiz L??G |??+??
- namm1
- Member
- Registered: 2014-11-07
- Posts: 118
Max only top 100 rec. Why ?
On the player stats record TODAY we can only have 100 recs, but I would like to see like 10k recs, so that I can save ALL my records in ONE page:
ex.:
http://dedimania.net/tmstats/?do=stat&a … ;Limit=100
When I put: Limit=1000, i only get 100.., can you pls fix this "bug".
thx
Offline
#2 2019-08-25 22:59:20
Re: Max only top 100 rec. Why ?
namm1 wrote:
On the player stats record TODAY we can only have 100 recs, but I would like to see like 10k recs, so that I can save ALL my records in ONE page:
ex.:
http://dedimania.net/tmstats/?do=stat&a … ;Limit=100
When I put: Limit=1000, i only get 100.., can you pls fix this "bug".
Not a bug but an intentional limit to avoid overloading the database and the server.
Offline
#3 2019-08-26 08:20:53
- ?? :?aradiz L??G |??+??
- namm1
- Member
- Registered: 2014-11-07
- Posts: 118
Re: Max only top 100 rec. Why ?
Ok, but that would be very nice if we could have all our records on ONE page; then I suggest that we could have a LINK of all our records on the TRACKMANIA PLAYER PAGE !
Please, that's the least you can do !
Last edited by namm1 (2019-08-26 08:27:58)
Offline
#4 2019-08-26 16:24:30
Re: Max only top 100 rec. Why ?
namm1 wrote:
Ok, but that would be very nice if we could have all our records on ONE page; then I suggest that we could have a LINK of all our records on the TRACKMANIA PLAYER PAGE !
Please, that's the least you can do !
That's something nobody can do, because the TMF player site is owned by Nadeo, who ceased developing for TMF nearly a decade ago. Plus it does not solve the aforementioned overload problem.
Offline
#5 2019-08-29 14:01:35
- ?? :?aradiz L??G |??+??
- namm1
- Member
- Registered: 2014-11-07
- Posts: 118
Re: Max only top 100 rec. Why ?
Probably a stupid question, but what if you make a Dedimania Premium, with paysafe card payment option, so that we can buy and get a page of all our records ?
Last edited by namm1 (2019-08-29 14:02:52)
Offline
#6 2019-11-16 09:29:50
- ?? :?aradiz L??G |??+??
- namm1
- Member
- Registered: 2014-11-07
- Posts: 118
Re: Max only top 100 rec. Why ?
xymph wrote:
Not a bug but an intentional limit to avoid overloading the database and the server.
I could have a semi-solution:
1-Creating a database of payers records.
2-To ONLY creat this database of payers who ask to have a database of their records. (only a few)
Then updating rank and times of records ONLY when they change in this database.
Advantage: when accessing to the database there is not a scanning of all maps, cause it is a database who is already memorised.
Hope you undersand the idea here ?
Thx, hope you could work a such a projet, that seems quite easy.
Offline
#8 2020-06-13 12:16:56
- ?? :?aradiz L??G |??+??
- namm1
- Member
- Registered: 2014-11-07
- Posts: 118
Re: Max only top 100 rec. Why ?
Last try on my side 
:
Maybe you could give the option to PREMIUM dedimania owner (few people) to access full personal database records, ones a month, for ex. ?
Last edited by namm1 (2020-06-13 12:17:16)
Offline
#9 2020-06-26 15:24:19
Re: Max only top 100 rec. Why ?
Interesting idea.
I have added a link 'MyRecs' on upper right to see directly your own records with a increased limit of returned results (and a default value to 2000 that you can change at bottom, and for tm2 you can set it higher if premium that if not). The link is visible only when connected of course. You don't really have to use the link to have the increased limit possibility, but it is easier to go to your records using it anyway.
Is it ok for you like this ?
Offline
#11 2020-08-30 19:36:20
- ?? :?aradiz L??G |??+??
- namm1
- Member
- Registered: 2014-11-07
- Posts: 118
Re: Max only top 100 rec. Why ?
I think recs better have to be ranked with Rank (asc) Date (Desc) automatically.
Which means only better records first, which seems to be more organized like that. That's only a suggestion from my side.
thx
Offline