Dedimania forum

here we go uploaded them anyway

http://tmnforever.tm-exchange.com/main. … 33685#auto
http://tmnforever.tm-exchange.com/main. … 21305#auto there was a tmx replay anyway...
http://tmnforever.tm-exchange.com/main. … 23352#auto
http://tmnforever.tm-exchange.com/main. … 11142#auto
http://tmnforever.tm-exchange.com/main. … 78279#auto

nevermind have a great one

Last edited by moron12 (2013-01-14 19:19:50)

Login: ergys99
http://www.dedimania.com/tmstats/?do=st … CxT7PipoM0
http://www.dedimania.com/tmstats/?do=st … ow=RECORDS
PS: If you like, update my name as well?

Last edited by sick_castrator (2013-01-18 23:10:48)

Ups, sorry, didnt watch the date.
Thought on such an old map there will be no more new recs
Thanks for name-update

Hi, i want to report a cheater:

1. UId of  a map: 6Xtjl6rVNsKaTcPonFfN
2. Login of a player who cheated: crockslock
3. Description of cheating: He cheated on mini RPG server. He made an impossible time on reported map, so i decided to spectate him. I saw his car literally "flying" over a map. So i blacklisted him and came here to report him. He is about 10 secs faster then first dedi guy.
4. -
5. TMX link: http://tmnforever.tm-exchange.com/main. … id=3741866

enryx13 wrote:

http://dedimania.net/tmstats/?do=stat&Mode=M1&RecOrder3=RANK-ASC&Uid=s_zFqpnertZnlBM1UZS1P_4Vkif&Show=RECORDS

Top1 (rocky1803) and Top2 (dyland0404) times look too fast compared to 3-30 can you have a look? No-CP it could be misplaced entries.

It was rocky1803's only record, and probably cheated or a glitch - deleted.
There are no suspect entries among dyland0404's records (as far as I checked), so I'll give that one the benefit of the doubt.

enryx13 wrote:

btw the server-login where they were driven is displayed as " missing:16717 " not sure what that's supposed to mean

For unknown reasons, a number of entries in the server table of the Dedimania database were lost last Summer, and Slig recreated them with that "login".

tosh686 wrote:

Are the first records cheat or luck?
Login: laurensjes
http://dedimania.net/tmstats/?do=stat&a … ow=RECORDS

I reckon that's cheated - even if the penultimate sector (0.4s faster than average) was luck, the last one (another 0.45s) couldn't be, as there's no way to gain that much speed on such a small distance.

tosh686 wrote:

http://dedimania.net/tmstats/?do=stat&Mode=M1&RecOrder3=RANK-ASC&Uid=TjFEj3JGGeIJW_T8sgd6t7iD3Ad&Show=RECORDS

Don't know about that one - but it's deleted anyway as part of the housekeeping for the above.
Thanks for the report.

I have the same error

First rec one this one: http://dedimania.net/tmstats/?do=stat&a … ow=RECORDS

The second sector may be somehow possible, but third and forth are way to fast.

Edit: But I seen on a simular track times which are to good for my taste, but by players from which I know the dont cheat... maybe here is a way to which I dont see...

Last edited by bode_leon (2013-01-25 19:05:14)

login: boomerwos
Suspect records: ALL!
Examples: Knights Cup maps. He drove in a week like 62 WR's on nolifed maps and always with strange cp's. On this map (UD:kRXnzJBvNpa1otizksPSSbMG46k) he has -40 on 1st cp on all the other dedi recs and cut is not poss. You can check all other WR's by him. Either he has extreme bad or good 1st sectors.
Please check this and ban him...
Here a screen without valid time...
http://leg-trackmania.de/mypics/TmForev … -09-86.bmp

Last edited by keny__d (2013-01-27 22:18:51)

login: losi1

cheater spoted on several stadium map

login: corsakoff_live

map:
UID:XB2ES4prG6R9ZGAr5RciSKsJbRb
http://tmnforever.tm-exchange.com/main. … 61664#auto


at first it does not look unusal and i am not saying the time is not possible.

I tried it a few times.
His first cp is 4.48 and if you drive so close to the 1.cp you do not have a lot of speed for the jump, therefore his second sector is very fast . I checked out the other dedimania records and it proved that my thinking was right. Some drivers with a similar 1.cp (4.49-4.51)have 6.19+ in that sector( he got 6,11). With that cp you are not able to get a 14.6x cause of the low speed you have due to the close start.

Checked and still checking a lot of his records and most of them are useless to report cause those maps do not have any cps, so i am reporting everyone which has the smallest suspicious/weird sector in it(just saying that cause i know it is not a big evidence but it is clearly one). He is keep getting frist dedimania records each day (about 10 p. day, beating them by 0.01-0.05 mostly) and since new year he "drove" 302 of them. I understand if you saying that those maps all lucky ones, cause most of them are, but not even the really good players placing so many first dedimania records in 2 month.

Last edited by moron12 (2013-02-26 03:29:09)

i would also add a few to the list if you don't mind Xymph.  if you do mind delete it:D

nations or no TMX:
http://www.xaseco.org/uidfinder.php?uid … dmJDr84zPg
http://www.xaseco.org/uidfinder.php?uid … KYUB1k1kP5
http://www.xaseco.org/uidfinder.php?uid … e3rAOyMl_l

at least those pls:D
http://www.xaseco.org/uidfinder.php?uid … KS8IG5_8Xj
http://www.xaseco.org/uidfinder.php?uid … DwSz7Ciiaf
http://www.xaseco.org/uidfinder.php?uid … H1B1r_pow7
http://www.xaseco.org/uidfinder.php?uid … 1OVGhk4si9

Last edited by moron12 (2013-02-26 12:40:28)

Tag zusammen^^
Ich beobachte gerne diesen Forum Es ist immer wieder lustig wenn sich Fahrer aufregen, wenn einer besser ist, als sie selbst Vorab weg ich will niemanden in Schutz nehmen aber ich finde es doch sehr merkwürdig das sich moron12 so aufregt! Er behauptet niemand fährt soviele Dedis wie corsakoff_live an einem Tag.
Login: Demis
Er fährt jeden tag über 1. neue Dedis. Also nichts ungewöhnliches.
Moron12 ist auch ein "Anfänger" wenn man seine ranking sieht Er hat über 60 neue 1. Dedis von corsakoff_live unterboten. 40 davon ohne CP. Und das in 2 Monaten Darüber regt sich seltsamerweiser keiner auf!! Also sind doch die recs von corsakoff-live nichts besonderes. Jetzt postet er mal eine map wo er nicht den 1. dedi fahren kann. Sorry aber das ist mehr als suspekt. Und all seine recs von Moron12 sind auch auf Privaten Server mit Passwort gefahren
Login: moron12
UID: AqVq7caGdXOsgmOvjXfCdjoosXl
UID: KcsG7NDk61QGKyzNzkNL0pZg1T6
UID: HqjRA_RIRGdPDLQgqlk8CA_ST8j
UID: RjQTOjVgqPmrqwtlowEDjn0r6M7
UID: Rs7LuzBfq_i_qga9A1XRFzwkBv6
UID: KJ78nxIaYwQ4zb5mME4NUT0ky26     Time: 13.42-13.46. Hier gehen auch 13.34.? wenn ja, sind alle maps immer besser zu fahren;). Weil er regt sich ja auf das corsakoff_live bei vielen Maps  0.01-0.03 schneller ist
UID: AqVq7caGdXOsgmOvjXfCdjoosXl   Diese Map ist von Style her wie die UID:XB2ES4prG6R9ZGAr5RciSKsJbRb
also warum soll diese Zeit von corsakoff_live unmöglich sein??

Aber wenn Moron12 alle Replays zeigt sieht man doch das es immer besser und schneller geht

Ein anderes Beispiel:



boerta87 wrote:

i i know that^^ but he got plenty of recs where he got always  0,01 better that the thing^^ and this are always maps without cps -.- 

hmm http://tmnforever.tm-exchange.com/main. … 36260#auto

u deleted this frist rec of loft-room?? that was for example a hard dedi to break and he got ,95

Xxmph wrote: Yes, the normal procedure for one cheated entry is to delete about two dozen more as initial punishment.
The .96 replay on TMX by rus_mischa looks very tight but I can't tell whether it's impossible to shave 0.01 off of it. So that gets the benefit of the doubt.
http://tmnforever.tm-exchange.com/main. … 36260#auto
Angeblich gehen KEINE 16.95 und du hast damals die recs von loft-room alle gelöscht^^ jetzt gehen sogar 16.94^^

Nochmals: ich will keinen in Schutz nehmen. nur ich habe das Gefühl das Moron12 einen hohen Neid-Faktor hat.

Login:  babynat
Login:  looky62 (Tag is :.исτ« Ѕιмои.)
UID: kyUlrgz4JUVYLgE02LfNQjkLsfb
1. CP zeit unmöglich !!! Max. 3.21sec 1. Cp. 2.dedi vom  dimitri5757 halte ich auch nicht möglich.....Beide recs wurden auf dem selben Server gefahren

So, genug^^ Xmph du machst einen sehr guten Job hier. Aber irgendwelche Leute zu bannen oder zu Speeren nur weil einige hier nicht klar kommen, wenn einige besser sind, finde ich das persönlich sehr schade.